↓ Skip to main content

Elective Nodal Irradiation Attenuates the Combinatorial Efficacy of Stereotactic Radiation Therapy and Immunotherapy

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Cancer Research, October 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
68 X users
patent
4 patents

Readers on

mendeley
191 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Elective Nodal Irradiation Attenuates the Combinatorial Efficacy of Stereotactic Radiation Therapy and Immunotherapy
Published in
Clinical Cancer Research, October 2018
DOI 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-17-3427
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

In the proper context, radiation therapy (RT) can promote anti-tumor immunity. It is unknown if elective nodal irradiation (ENI), a strategy that irradiates tumor-associated draining lymph nodes (DLN), impacts adaptive immune responses and combinatorial efficacy of RT with immune checkpoint blockade (ICB). We developed a preclinical model to compare stereotactic RT (Tumor RT) with or without ENI to examine immunological differences between RT techniques that spare or irradiate the DLN. Tumor RT was associated with up-regulation of an intratumoral T-cell chemoattractant chemokine signature (CXCR3, CCR5-related) that resulted in robust infiltration of antigen-specific CD8+ effector T-cells as well as FoxP3+ regulatory T-cells (Tregs). The addition of ENI attenuated chemokine expression, restrained immune infiltration and adversely impacted survival when combined with ICB, especially with anti-CLTA4 therapy. The combination of stereotactic RT and ICB led to long-term survival in a subset of mice and was associated with favorable CD8 effector-to-Treg ratios and increased intratumoral density of antigen-specific CD8+ T-cells. While RT technique (Tumor RT vs. ENI) impacted initial tumor control and survival, the ability to reject tumor upon re-challenge was partially dependent upon the mechanism of action of ICB; as RT/anti-CTLA4 was superior to RT/anti-PD-1. Our results highlight that irradiation of the DLN restrains adaptive immune responses through altered chemokine expression and CD8+ T-cell trafficking. These data have implications for combining RT and ICB, long-term survival and induction of immunological memory. Clinically, the immunomodulatory effect of the RT strategy should be considered when combining stereotactic RT with immunotherapy.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 68 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 191 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 191 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 16%
Researcher 22 12%
Other 20 10%
Student > Master 19 10%
Student > Bachelor 10 5%
Other 34 18%
Unknown 56 29%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 56 29%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 17 9%
Immunology and Microbiology 12 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 5%
Engineering 4 2%
Other 17 9%
Unknown 75 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 46. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 December 2024.
All research outputs
#1,170,102
of 34,599,069 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Cancer Research
#737
of 17,699 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,208
of 391,310 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Cancer Research
#16
of 190 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,599,069 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,699 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 391,310 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 190 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.