↓ Skip to main content

The process of change in psychotherapy for depression: helping clients to reformulate the problem

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Psychiatric & Mental Health Nursing, November 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
105 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
The process of change in psychotherapy for depression: helping clients to reformulate the problem
Published in
Journal of Psychiatric & Mental Health Nursing, November 2011
DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2850.2011.01840.x
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

There is increasing interest in mental health nurses delivering structured short-term evidence-based psychotherapies such as cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) and interpersonal psychotherapy (IPT); however, while there is evidence of the efficacy of psychotherapy for depression, there is limited understanding of the treatment processes. Data were drawn from audio tapes of CBT and IPT sessions for treatment of depression. The transcripts of the initial, middle and final psychotherapy sessions of 40 clients were analysed. A thematic analysis was conducted to identify what was occurring in the sessions, how the client was describing psychotherapy and how the client was describing improvement or lack of improvement in depressive symptoms. There were differences in descriptions of therapy and the experience of depression between clients who responded and those who did not respond to therapy that were related to improvement in symptoms but not to the specific therapy. These differences were in the client's engagement with the language of therapy, sense of optimism about the particular model of psychotherapy, ability to examine their own role in the problem and desire to engage with new ways of being in their lives. Clients who responded to CBT or IPT had flexibility to develop new ways of thinking and acting, the ability to accept responsibility for their role in the identified problem and were willing to risk change.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 105 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 102 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 16 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 13%
Researcher 14 13%
Student > Bachelor 13 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 9%
Other 20 19%
Unknown 19 18%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 35 33%
Medicine and Dentistry 18 17%
Social Sciences 5 5%
Sports and Recreations 4 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 3%
Other 15 14%
Unknown 25 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 November 2011.
All research outputs
#24,752,513
of 34,359,530 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Psychiatric & Mental Health Nursing
#1,180
of 1,536 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#149,669
of 193,473 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Psychiatric & Mental Health Nursing
#11
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,359,530 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,536 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 193,473 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.