↓ Skip to main content

Applied and Emerging Methods for Meat Tenderization: A Comparative Perspective

Overview of attention for article published in Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science & Food Safety, May 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
reddit
2 Redditors

Readers on

mendeley
265 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Applied and Emerging Methods for Meat Tenderization: A Comparative Perspective
Published in
Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science & Food Safety, May 2018
DOI 10.1111/1541-4337.12356
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 265 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 265 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 33 12%
Student > Bachelor 31 12%
Researcher 16 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 4%
Other 37 14%
Unknown 124 47%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 70 26%
Engineering 12 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 4%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 5 2%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 2%
Other 24 9%
Unknown 139 52%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 August 2021.
All research outputs
#24,819,038
of 34,457,357 outputs
Outputs from Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science & Food Safety
#955
of 1,255 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#260,067
of 371,888 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science & Food Safety
#13
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,457,357 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,255 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.2. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 371,888 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.