↓ Skip to main content

On underestimation of global vulnerability to tree mortality and forest die‐off from hotter drought in the Anthropocene

Overview of attention for article published in Ecosphere, August 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#41 of 3,479)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
13 news outlets
blogs
6 blogs
policy
3 policy sources
twitter
105 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
1826 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1854 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
On underestimation of global vulnerability to tree mortality and forest die‐off from hotter drought in the Anthropocene
Published in
Ecosphere, August 2015
DOI 10.1890/es15-00203.1
Authors

Craig D. Allen, David D. Breshears, Nate G. McDowell

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 105 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,854 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 13 <1%
Spain 5 <1%
Canada 4 <1%
Switzerland 2 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
Australia 2 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Other 4 <1%
Unknown 1818 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 393 21%
Researcher 310 17%
Student > Master 266 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 119 6%
Student > Bachelor 114 6%
Other 230 12%
Unknown 422 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 536 29%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 455 25%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 157 8%
Engineering 55 3%
Social Sciences 17 <1%
Other 110 6%
Unknown 524 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 212. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 December 2023.
All research outputs
#186,827
of 25,748,735 outputs
Outputs from Ecosphere
#41
of 3,479 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,946
of 276,594 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecosphere
#2
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,748,735 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,479 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 276,594 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.