↓ Skip to main content

An Automated Multiparametric MRI Quantitative Imaging Prostate Habitat Risk Scoring System for Defining External Beam Radiation Therapy Boost Volumes

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics, June 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
45 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
An Automated Multiparametric MRI Quantitative Imaging Prostate Habitat Risk Scoring System for Defining External Beam Radiation Therapy Boost Volumes
Published in
International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics, June 2018
DOI 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2018.06.003
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

To develop a prostate tumor habitat risk scoring (HRS) system based on multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) referenced to prostatectomy Gleason Score (GS) for automatic delineation of Gross Tumor Volumes (GTVs). A workflow for integration of HRS into radiotherapy (RT) boost volume dose escalation was developed in the framework of a Phase II randomized clinical trial (BLaStM). An automated quantitative mpMRI based 10 point pixel by pixel method was optimized to prostatectomy GSs and volumes using referenced Dynamic Contrast Enhanced and Apparent Diffusion Coefficient sequences. The HRS contours were migrated to the planning CT for boost volume generation. There were 51 regions of interest (ROIs) in 12 patients who underwent radical prostatectomy (RP) (26 with GS≥7 and 25 with GS6). The resultant heat maps showed inter- and intra-tumoral heterogeneity. The HRS6 level was significantly associated with RP ROIs (slope 1.09, r=0.767; p<.0001). For predicting the likelihood of cancer, GS≥7 and GS≥8, HRS6 AUCs were 0.718, 0.802 and 0.897, respectively. HRS was superior to the Prostate Imaging, Reporting and Diagnosis System 4/5 classification, wherein the AUCs were 0.62, 0.64 and 0.617, respectively (difference with HR6, p<.0001). HRS maps were created for the first 37 assessable patients on the BLaStM trial. There were an average of 1.38 habitat boost volumes per patient at a total boost volume average of 3.6 cc. An automated quantitative mpMRI based method was developed to objectively guide dose escalation to high risk habitat volumes based on prostatectomy GS.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 45 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 13%
Student > Bachelor 5 11%
Student > Master 4 9%
Other 3 7%
Other 5 11%
Unknown 13 29%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 27%
Computer Science 3 7%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 4%
Physics and Astronomy 2 4%
Social Sciences 2 4%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 20 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 June 2018.
All research outputs
#23,329,605
of 34,411,289 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics
#11,405
of 15,467 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#240,014
of 373,134 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics
#77
of 192 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,411,289 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,467 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.3. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 373,134 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 192 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.