↓ Skip to main content

Solitomab, an EpCAM/CD3 bispecific antibody construct (BiTE), is highly active against primary uterine serous papillary carcinoma cell lines in vitro

Overview of attention for article published in American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, August 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
patent
8 patents

Readers on

mendeley
54 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Solitomab, an EpCAM/CD3 bispecific antibody construct (BiTE), is highly active against primary uterine serous papillary carcinoma cell lines in vitro
Published in
American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, August 2015
DOI 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.08.011
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Uterine serous carcinoma (USC) is an aggressive form of endometrial cancer which carries an extremely poor prognosis. Solitomab is a novel bispecific single-chain antibody construct which targets epithelial-cell-adhesion-molecule (EpCAM) on tumor cells and also contains a CD3 binding region. We evaluated the expression levels of EpCAM and the in vitro activity of solitomab against primary USC cell lines in vitro and ex-vivo in the ascites of USC patients. To determine the frequency of expression of EpCAM on uterine serous carcinoma cell lines as well as the ability of solitomab to modulate immune responses (T-cell proliferation, activation, cytokine production, and tumor killing) to tumor cells when it is combined with lymphocytes and EpCAM positive cell lines or EpCAM positive acitic fluid in vitro. EpCAM expression was evaluated by flow cytometry in a total of 14 primary USC cell lines. Sensitivity to solitomab-dependent-cellular-cytotoxicity (ADCC) was tested against a panel of primary USC cell lines expressing different levels of EpCAM in standard 4h (51)Cr release-assays. The proliferative activity, activation, cytokine secretion (i.e., Type I vs Type II) and cytotoxicity of solitomab in autologous tumor-associated-T cells (TAL) in the ascitic fluid of USC patients was also evaluated by CFSE and flow-cytometry assays. Differences in EpCAM expression, ADCC levels were analyzed using upaired t test. T-cell activation marker increase and cytokine release were analyzed by paired t test. Surface expression of EpCAM was found in 85.7% (12 out of 14) of the USC cell lines tested by flow cytometry. EpCAM positive cell lines were found resistant to NK or T-cell-mediated killing after exposure to peripheral blood lymphocytes (PBL) in 4-hour chromium-release assays (mean killing ± SEM, 2.7 ± 3.1% after incubation of EpCAM positive cell lines with control BiTE®). In contrast, after incubation with solitomab, EpCAM positive USC cells became highly sensitive to T cell cytotoxicity (mean killing ± SEM of 25.7 ± 4.5%; P < 0.0001) by PBL. Ex vivo incubation of autologous tumor associated lymphocytes (TAL) with EpCAM expressing malignant cells in ascites with solitomab, resulted in a significant increase in T-cell proliferation in both CD4+ and CD8+ T cells, increase in T-cell activation markers (i.e., CD25 and HLA-DR), and a reduction in number of viable USC cells in ascites (P < 0.001). Solitomab induces robust immunologic responses in vitro resulting in increased T-cell activation, proliferation, production of cytokines, and direct killing of tumor cells. These finding suggest that solitomab may represent a novel, potentially effective agent for treatment of recurrent/metastatic and/or chemo-resistant USC overexpressing EpCAM.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Germany 1 2%
Unknown 53 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 15%
Student > Bachelor 7 13%
Student > Master 6 11%
Other 4 7%
Other 9 17%
Unknown 9 17%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 28%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 19%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 13%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 6%
Chemistry 3 6%
Other 4 7%
Unknown 12 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 March 2026.
All research outputs
#6,093,186
of 34,361,833 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology
#5,712
of 17,471 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,045
of 299,016 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology
#56
of 128 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,361,833 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,471 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 299,016 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 128 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.