↓ Skip to main content

Therapeutic alliance predicts mood but not alcohol outcome in a comorbid treatment setting

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, April 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
101 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Therapeutic alliance predicts mood but not alcohol outcome in a comorbid treatment setting
Published in
Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, April 2018
DOI 10.1016/j.jsat.2018.04.007
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The pan-theoretical variable of alliance has been consistently reported to have a moderate yet robust effect on psychotherapy treatment outcome. However, the relationship is less clear in the addiction field where there is more limited research. The current study investigated the relationship between alliance and treatment outcome in an alcohol dependent and depressed population. The Treatment Evaluation of Alcohol and Mood (TEAM) study was a randomized controlled pharmacotherapy trial with supportive clinical case management. Therapist and client alliance ratings were assessed using the Working Alliance Inventory (WAI) for 123 client-therapist dyads at 3 weeks. Outcome data was obtained at 3 and 12 weeks (end of treatment). Drinking-related measures included Percent Days Abstinent (PDA) and Drinks per Drinking Day (DDD). Mood outcomes were scores on the Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS). Clients rated alliance significantly higher than did therapists and client and therapist ratings were not associated with each other. Baseline motivation was the only pre-treatment client variable associated with alliance, the higher the client's Readiness to Change Questionnaire-Treatment Version (RCQ-TV) score, the higher the therapist-rated alliance. Higher therapists' ratings of alliance were significantly associated with improved mood outcomes at the end of treatment but, with one minor exception, were not related to drinking outcomes. Therapist alliance was also significantly associated with treatment completion. In contrast, client-rated alliance was not related to mood or drinking outcomes, possibly due to a ceiling effect. Subscale analysis found that of the different components that comprise the alliance concept, the task component was most important for drinking outcomes whereas the task and goal components were equally important for mood outcomes. Controlling for early symptom change did not meaningfully alter associations between therapist alliance and mood. In contrast, the strength of associations between therapist alliance and drinking outcomes was reduced for PDA and DDD 12-week change scores, whereas the association between the therapist alliance and 12-week PDA became significant when previously this had not been the case. Therapeutic alliance was associated with improved mood outcomes, which is consistent with other research. However, alliance, as measured by the WAI, and drinking outcomes, were not related. Findings from these investigations signal the need to re-examine the concept and measurement of alliance in substance-using treatment populations, particularly with regard to drinking outcomes. Within this re-examination, findings support a greater focus on the therapists' role in the alliance-outcome relationship.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 101 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 101 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 19 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 12%
Researcher 12 12%
Student > Master 6 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 4%
Other 13 13%
Unknown 35 35%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 21 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 15 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 10%
Social Sciences 5 5%
Arts and Humanities 2 2%
Other 10 10%
Unknown 38 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 June 2019.
All research outputs
#18,577,651
of 27,788,803 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment
#1,893
of 2,597 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#215,990
of 345,345 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment
#17
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,788,803 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,597 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.1. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 345,345 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.