↓ Skip to main content

Diagnosis and Treatment of Depression in Late Life

Overview of attention for article published in JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, August 1992
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

guideline
3 clinical guideline sources

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Diagnosis and Treatment of Depression in Late Life
Published in
JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, August 1992
DOI 10.1001/jama.1992.03490080092032
Authors

Arnold J. Friedhoff, James Ballenger, Alan S. Bellack, William T. Carpenter, Helena Chang Chui, Rose Dobrof, Joyce J. Fitzpatrick, Rudolph Freeman, George R. Heninger, Philip W. Lavori, Kathleen Ries Merikangas, Raymond Raschko, Martha Storandt, Mark E. Williams, Charles F. Reynolds, Dan G. Blazer, Eric D. Caine, Burton V. Reifler, Elaine Murphy, George S. Alexopoulos, Andrew F. Leuchter, Linda K. George, Paul T. Costa, A. John Rush, Carl Salzman, James M. Perel, Harold A. Sackeim, Linda Teri, George Niederehe, Ellen Frank, Sidney Klawansky, Joel B. Greenhouse, Lon S. Schneider, Gary L. Gottlieb, Yeates Conwell, Sidney Zisook, Ira R. Katz, Barry D. Lebowitz, Marsha Corbett, Jerry M. Elliott, John H. Ferguson, James L. Fosard, William H. Hall, Jane L. Pearson

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 19 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 26%
Student > Bachelor 2 11%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 5%
Lecturer 1 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 5%
Other 3 16%
Unknown 6 32%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 26%
Psychology 2 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 5%
Linguistics 1 5%
Social Sciences 1 5%
Other 2 11%
Unknown 7 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 November 2005.
All research outputs
#5,176,099
of 34,518,147 outputs
Outputs from JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
#20,706
of 42,538 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,515
of 27,037 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
#27
of 130 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,518,147 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 42,538 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 73.0. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 27,037 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 130 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.