↓ Skip to main content

Antibody selection using clonal cocultivation of Escherichia coli and eukaryotic cells in miniecosystems

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, June 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
10 news outlets
twitter
5 X users

Readers on

mendeley
62 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Antibody selection using clonal cocultivation of Escherichia coli and eukaryotic cells in miniecosystems
Published in
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, June 2018
DOI 10.1073/pnas.1806718115
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

We describe a method for the rapid selection of functional antibodies. The method depends on the cocultivation of Escherichia coli that produce phage with target eukaryotic cells in very small volumes. The antibodies on phage induce selectable phenotypes in the target cells, and the nature of the antibody is determined by gene sequencing of the phage genome. To select functional antibodies from the diverse antibody repertoire, we devised a selection platform that contains millions of picoliter-sized droplet ecosystems. In each miniecosystem, the bacteria produce phage displaying unique members of the antibody repertoire. These phage interact only with eukaryotic cells in the same miniecosystem, making phage available directly for activity-based antibody selection in biological systems.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 62 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 16 26%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 19%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 8%
Other 4 6%
Student > Master 3 5%
Other 4 6%
Unknown 18 29%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 19 31%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 10%
Chemistry 6 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 8%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 3%
Other 6 10%
Unknown 18 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 68. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 February 2021.
All research outputs
#803,816
of 34,560,275 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#12,400
of 119,174 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,144
of 373,552 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#193
of 947 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,560,275 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 119,174 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 373,552 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 947 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.