↓ Skip to main content

Evaluating the orthogeriatric model of care at an Australian tertiary hospital

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Orthopaedic & Trauma Nursing, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
59 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Evaluating the orthogeriatric model of care at an Australian tertiary hospital
Published in
International Journal of Orthopaedic & Trauma Nursing, March 2015
DOI 10.1016/j.ijotn.2015.03.001
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The management of fragility hip fractures requires a collaborative multi-disciplinary approach to care to ensure optimal patient outcomes. It is important to rigorously evaluate the model of care and enable the delivery of evidence based optimal patient care. The aim of this study was to document an orthogeriatric model of care (OGMOC) at a major tertiary hospital: assessing how particular indicators within the patient's admission were influenced by the OGMOC. A retrospective case analysis of all patients with fragility hip fracture from two pre-intervention groups and three post-intervention groups was undertaken. Data from (i) length of stay in the emergency department (ii) length of stay in the orthopaedic unit (iii) time from admission to surgery and (iv) time from surgery to admission to rehabilitation were used. Implementation of the OGMOC resulted in: reduced time in the emergency department, quicker access to surgery, reduced length of acute hospital stay and an increase in the number of patients accessing the rehabilitation unit. This study contributes to the increasing body of evidence for best practice in the management of fragility hip fracture within an OGMOC.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Australia 1 2%
Unknown 58 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 17%
Student > Master 8 14%
Student > Bachelor 7 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 5%
Librarian 2 3%
Other 8 14%
Unknown 21 36%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 27%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 10%
Social Sciences 3 5%
Psychology 2 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Other 4 7%
Unknown 27 46%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 August 2015.
All research outputs
#28,195,722
of 33,945,077 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Orthopaedic & Trauma Nursing
#128
of 156 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#233,024
of 299,359 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Orthopaedic & Trauma Nursing
#6
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 33,945,077 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 156 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 299,359 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.