↓ Skip to main content

Improving Cognitive Function in Older Adults: Nontraditional Approaches

Overview of attention for article published in Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences & Social Sciences, June 2007
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Improving Cognitive Function in Older Adults: Nontraditional Approaches
Published in
Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences & Social Sciences, June 2007
DOI 10.1093/geronb/62.special_issue_1.45
Pubmed ID
Authors

Denise C. Park, Angela H. Gutchess, Michelle L. Meade, Elizabeth A. L. Stine-Morrow

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 June 2018.
All research outputs
#14,574,633
of 23,342,232 outputs
Outputs from Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences & Social Sciences
#1,441
of 1,944 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#60,918
of 71,492 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences & Social Sciences
#10
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,342,232 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,944 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.8. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 71,492 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.