How Long Is Too Long in Contemporary Peer Review? Perspectives from Authors Publishing in Conservation Biology Journals

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, August 2015

Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs: 2 blogs
policy: 1 policy source
twitter: 29 X users

facebook: 1 Facebook page
reddit: 4 Redditors
q&a: 1 Q&A thread

Readers on

mendeley: 128 Mendeley

So far, Altmetric has seen 32 X posts from 29 X users, with an upper bound of 108,243 followers.

RT @s_ayebkarlsson: All I will say is: “Perspectives from Authors Publishing in Conservation Biology Journals”

….also why hasn’t the UN ratified her ‘report’? 2) peer review should not take this long since it invalidates the results due to the passage of time Have a look at this https://t.co/yfAGU0qFp4 3) it’s not accepted practice for a researcher to publicise t…

@marciopie https://t.co/PLreB59obc

@HBrowman @VKomyakova13 Nguyen et al. comment on perceptions of short vs long review times from authors in conservation biology... also found that younger and male authors are the most impatient. Go figure https://t.co/rSjyndeLWE

This page shows the most recent X posts that mention this research output. Click here to find out how to access more activity, including 28 additional X posts.