↓ Skip to main content

Adolescent treatment initiation and engagement in an evidence-based practice initiative

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, November 2011
Altmetric Badge

Readers on

mendeley
105 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Adolescent treatment initiation and engagement in an evidence-based practice initiative
Published in
Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, November 2011
DOI 10.1016/j.jsat.2011.09.005
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

This study examined client and program factors predicting initiation and engagement for 2,191 adolescents at 28 outpatient substance abuse treatment sites implementing evidence-based treatments. Using Washington Circle criteria for treatment initiation and engagement, 76% of the sample initiated, with 59% engaging in treatment. Analyses used a 2-stage Heckman probit regression, accounting for within-site clustering, to identify factors predictive of initiation and engagement. Adolescents treated in a pay-for-performance (P4P) group were more likely to initiate, whereas adolescents in the race/ethnicity category labeled other (Native American, Asian, Pacific Islander, Native Alaskan, Native Hawaiian, mixed race/ethnicity), or who reported high truancy, were less likely to initiate. Race/ethnicity groups other than Latinos were equally likely to engage. Among White adolescents, each additional day from first treatment to next treatment reduced likelihood of engagement. Although relatively high initiation and engagement rates were achieved, the results suggest that attention to program and client factors may further improve compliance with these performance indicators.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 105 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 102 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 21 20%
Researcher 18 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 10%
Student > Bachelor 8 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 7%
Other 16 15%
Unknown 24 23%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 20 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 19 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 11%
Social Sciences 11 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Other 9 9%
Unknown 31 30%