↓ Skip to main content

Age and performance at fledging are a cause and consequence of juvenile mortality between life stages

Overview of attention for article published in Science Advances, June 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
7 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
17 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Readers on

mendeley
119 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Age and performance at fledging are a cause and consequence of juvenile mortality between life stages
Published in
Science Advances, June 2018
DOI 10.1126/sciadv.aar1988
Pubmed ID
Authors

Thomas E. Martin, Bret Tobalske, Margaret M. Riordan, Samuel B. Case, Kenneth P. Dial

Abstract

Should they stay or should they leave? The age at which young transition between life stages, such as living in a nest versus leaving it, differs among species and the reasons why are unclear. We show that offspring of songbird species that leave the nest at a younger age have less developed wings that cause poorer flight performance and greater mortality after fledging. Experimentally delayed fledging verified that older age and better developed wings provide benefits of reduced juvenile mortality. Young are differentially constrained in the age that they can stay in the nest and enjoy these fitness benefits because of differences among species in opposing predation costs while in the nest. This tension between mortality in versus outside of the nest influences offspring traits and performance and creates an unrecognized conflict between parents and offspring that determines the optimal age to fledge.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 119 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 119 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 27 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 18%
Researcher 17 14%
Student > Bachelor 12 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 8%
Other 16 13%
Unknown 17 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 65 55%
Environmental Science 20 17%
Philosophy 2 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 2%
Social Sciences 2 2%
Other 5 4%
Unknown 23 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 73. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 August 2023.
All research outputs
#601,724
of 25,806,763 outputs
Outputs from Science Advances
#4,102
of 12,550 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,887
of 342,769 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science Advances
#95
of 240 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,806,763 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,550 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 119.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 342,769 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 240 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.