↓ Skip to main content

Abrupt Deflation after Sustained Inflation Causes Lung Injury

Overview of attention for article published in American Journal of Respiratory & Critical Care Medicine, November 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
36 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
68 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Abrupt Deflation after Sustained Inflation Causes Lung Injury
Published in
American Journal of Respiratory & Critical Care Medicine, November 2018
DOI 10.1164/rccm.201801-0178oc
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Ventilator management in ARDS focuses on 'setting' parameters and not on ventilator disconnection. To determine if abrupt deflation after sustained inflation causes lung injury. Male Sprague-Dawley rats were ventilated (6 mL·kg-1) and randomized to Control (n=6, PEEP 3 cmH2O; 100 min) or Intervention (n=6, PEEP 3 to 11 cmH2O over 70 min; abrupt deflation to zero PEEP; ventilation for 30 mins). Lung function and injury was assessed, scanning electron microscopy performed, and microvascular leak timed by Evans Blue dye (n=4/group at 0, 2, 5, 10 & 20 min post deflation). Hemodynamic assessment included systemic arterial pressure (n=6), echocardiography (n=4), and right (n=6) and left ventricular pressures (n=6). Abrupt deflation following sustained inflation (vs. control) caused acute lung dysfunction (compliance 0.48±1.0 vs. 0.82±0.2 mL·cmH20-1) and injury (wet/dry ratio 6.1±0.6 vs. 4.6±0.4: P<0.01). Vascular leak was absent before deflation and maximal 5-10 min thereafter; injury was predominantly endothelial. At deflation, left ventricular preload, systemic blood pressure and LVEDP increased precipitously in proportion to the degree of injury. Injury caused later right ventricular failure. Sodium nitroprusside prevented the increase in systemic blood pressure and LVEDP associated with deflation, and prevented injury. Injury did not occur with gradual deflation. Abrupt deflation after sustained inflation can cause acute lung injury. It appears to be mediated by acute LV decompensation (increased LV preload and afterload) that elevates pulmonary microvascular pressure; this injures the endothelium and causes edema, which is potentiated by the surge in pulmonary perfusion.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 36 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 68 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 68 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 15%
Researcher 8 12%
Other 7 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 3%
Other 6 9%
Unknown 31 46%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 23 34%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 4%
Engineering 2 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 35 51%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 February 2022.
All research outputs
#2,099,301
of 34,376,207 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Respiratory & Critical Care Medicine
#1,936
of 15,131 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,952
of 394,880 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Respiratory & Critical Care Medicine
#31
of 147 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,376,207 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,131 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 394,880 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 147 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.