↓ Skip to main content

Cuticular Hydrocarbon Pheromones for Social Behavior and Their Coding in the Ant Antenna

Overview of attention for article published in Cell Reports, August 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
17 news outlets
blogs
6 blogs
twitter
15 X users
patent
1 patent
facebook
1 Facebook page
reddit
1 Redditor

Readers on

mendeley
277 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Cuticular Hydrocarbon Pheromones for Social Behavior and Their Coding in the Ant Antenna
Published in
Cell Reports, August 2015
DOI 10.1016/j.celrep.2015.07.031
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The sophisticated organization of eusocial insect societies is largely based on the regulation of complex behaviors by hydrocarbon pheromones present on the cuticle. We used electrophysiology to investigate the detection of cuticular hydrocarbons (CHCs) by female-specific olfactory sensilla basiconica on the antenna of Camponotus floridanus ants through the utilization of one of the largest family of odorant receptors characterized so far in insects. These sensilla, each of which contains multiple olfactory receptor neurons, are differentially sensitive to CHCs and allow them to be classified into three broad groups that collectively detect every hydrocarbon tested, including queen and worker-enriched CHCs. This broad-spectrum sensitivity is conserved in a related species, Camponotus laevigatus, allowing these ants to detect CHCs from both nestmates and non-nestmates. Behavioral assays demonstrate that these ants are excellent at discriminating CHCs detected by the antenna, including enantiomers of a candidate queen pheromone that regulates the reproductive division of labor.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 277 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 3 1%
Austria 2 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Unknown 269 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 57 21%
Researcher 40 14%
Student > Bachelor 38 14%
Student > Master 23 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 22 8%
Other 37 13%
Unknown 60 22%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 116 42%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 31 11%
Neuroscience 19 7%
Environmental Science 15 5%
Chemistry 6 2%
Other 17 6%
Unknown 73 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 178. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 March 2026.
All research outputs
#286,430
of 34,752,441 outputs
Outputs from Cell Reports
#342
of 17,027 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,588
of 301,031 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cell Reports
#7
of 204 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,752,441 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,027 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 301,031 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 204 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.