↓ Skip to main content

Mutation rates in mammalian genomes

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, January 2002
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
3 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
8 X users
patent
2 patents
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
1 Google+ user
reddit
14 Redditors
q&a
2 Q&A threads
video
2 YouTube creators

Readers on

mendeley
559 Mendeley
citeulike
5 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Mutation rates in mammalian genomes
Published in
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, January 2002
DOI 10.1073/pnas.022629899
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 559 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 19 3%
Brazil 4 <1%
United Kingdom 4 <1%
Sweden 2 <1%
Switzerland 2 <1%
Colombia 2 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Other 10 2%
Unknown 511 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 125 22%
Researcher 117 21%
Student > Bachelor 59 11%
Student > Master 45 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 42 8%
Other 102 18%
Unknown 69 12%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 306 55%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 86 15%
Environmental Science 18 3%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 13 2%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 2%
Other 42 8%
Unknown 84 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 40. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 October 2025.
All research outputs
#1,303,705
of 34,400,738 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#18,256
of 118,992 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,073
of 199,307 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#10
of 505 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,400,738 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 118,992 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 199,307 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 505 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.