↓ Skip to main content

Effect of subcutaneous insulin detemir on glucose flux, lipolysis and electroencephalography in type 1 diabetes

Overview of attention for article published in Diabetes, Obesity & Metabolism, September 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
30 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Effect of subcutaneous insulin detemir on glucose flux, lipolysis and electroencephalography in type 1 diabetes
Published in
Diabetes, Obesity & Metabolism, September 2015
DOI 10.1111/dom.12553
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

To investigate the effects of subcutaneous detemir on glucose flux, lipid metabolism and brain function, twelve people with type 1 diabetes received in random order 0.5Units/kgBW detemir or NPH insulin. Glucose concentration was clamped at 5mmol/L then increased to 10mmol/L. Glucose production rate (glucose Ra), glucose uptake (glucose Rd) and glycerol production (glycerol Ra) were measured with a constant iv infusion of [6,6(2) H2 ]glucose and [(2) H5 ]glycerol. Electroencephalography direct (DC) and alternating (AC) current potentials were measured. While detemir induced comparable effects on glucose Ra, glucose Rd and glycerol Ra during euglycaemia, compared with NPH, it triggered a distinct negative shift in DC-potentials, with significant treatment effect in frontal cerebrocortical channels (p<0.001). AC spectral power showed significant differences in theta and alpha frequencies during euglycaemia (p=0.03). Subcutaneous detemir exerts different effects on brain function when compared with NPH in people with type 1 diabetes.This may be an important mechanism behind the limitation of weight gain with detemir.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 30 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 5 17%
Student > Master 5 17%
Student > Postgraduate 3 10%
Other 2 7%
Researcher 2 7%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 11 37%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 27%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Neuroscience 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 15 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 August 2015.
All research outputs
#27,725,202
of 34,359,530 outputs
Outputs from Diabetes, Obesity & Metabolism
#5,723
of 6,076 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#229,556
of 311,234 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Diabetes, Obesity & Metabolism
#51
of 59 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,359,530 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,076 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.6. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 311,234 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 59 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.