↓ Skip to main content

Lower Extremity Megaprostheses in Orthopaedic Oncology

Overview of attention for article published in JAAOS: Journal of the American Association of Orthopaedic Surgeons, June 2018
Altmetric Badge

Readers on

mendeley
60 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Lower Extremity Megaprostheses in Orthopaedic Oncology
Published in
JAAOS: Journal of the American Association of Orthopaedic Surgeons, June 2018
DOI 10.5435/jaaos-d-16-00218
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The megaprosthesis is designed to reproduce the form and function of a removed or lost large segment of bone and accompanying soft tissues. Slow but substantial improvements in the design and surgical implementation of these devices have advanced the capacity to restore patients' functional abilities. The essential challenges include identifying the ideal materials, bonding these materials to bone and soft tissues, reproducing functional anatomy, and adapting to the growing skeleton. Failure of these devices can result from soft-tissue insufficiency, aseptic loosening, structural failures, infection, and tumor recurrence. The history of the use of megaprostheses in the pelvis, proximal femur, distal femur, total femur, and proximal tibia has shown that each anatomic area presents unique challenges. Improvements that have been made over the years will guide the development of the next generation of devices. Despite early high complication rates, these devices are a reasonable choice in the right patient.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 60 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 11 18%
Student > Master 7 12%
Student > Postgraduate 6 10%
Student > Bachelor 4 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 5%
Other 10 17%
Unknown 19 32%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 26 43%
Engineering 4 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 3%
Chemical Engineering 1 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Other 4 7%
Unknown 22 37%