↓ Skip to main content

Measuring Team Performance in Simulation-Based Training: Adopting Best Practices for Healthcare

Overview of attention for article published in Simulation in Healthcare, January 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
326 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Measuring Team Performance in Simulation-Based Training: Adopting Best Practices for Healthcare
Published in
Simulation in Healthcare, January 2008
DOI 10.1097/sih.0b013e3181626276
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Team performance measurement is a critical and frequently overlooked component of an effective simulation-based training system designed to build teamwork competencies. Quality team performance measurement is essential for systematically diagnosing team performance and subsequently making decisions concerning feedback and remediation. However, the complexities of team performance pose a challenge to effectively measuring team performance. This article synthesizes the scientific literature on this topic and provides a set of best practices for designing and implementing team performance measurement systems in simulation-based training.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 326 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 9 3%
Sweden 3 <1%
Canada 3 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Australia 2 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 302 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 50 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 48 15%
Researcher 45 14%
Other 26 8%
Student > Bachelor 22 7%
Other 87 27%
Unknown 48 15%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 96 29%
Psychology 42 13%
Social Sciences 26 8%
Business, Management and Accounting 25 8%
Computer Science 21 6%
Other 59 18%
Unknown 57 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 November 2011.
All research outputs
#24,752,513
of 34,359,530 outputs
Outputs from Simulation in Healthcare
#776
of 1,205 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#200,394
of 226,338 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Simulation in Healthcare
#12
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,359,530 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,205 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 226,338 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.