↓ Skip to main content

Beyond degree and betweenness centrality: Alternative topological measures to predict viral targets

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, May 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
18 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Beyond degree and betweenness centrality: Alternative topological measures to predict viral targets
Published in
PLOS ONE, May 2018
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0197595
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The availability of large-scale screens of host-virus interaction interfaces enabled the topological analysis of viral protein targets of the host. In particular, host proteins that bind viral proteins are generally hubs and proteins with high betweenness centrality. Recently, other topological measures were introduced that a virus may tap to infect a host cell. Utilizing experimentally determined sets of human protein targets from Herpes, Hepatitis, HIV and Influenza, we pooled molecular interactions between proteins from different pathway databases. Apart from a protein's degree and betweenness centrality, we considered a protein's pathway participation, ability to topologically control a network and protein PageRank index. In particular, we found that proteins with increasing values of such measures tend to accumulate viral targets and distinguish viral targets from non-targets. Furthermore, all such topological measures strongly correlate with the occurrence of a given protein in different pathways. Building a random forest classifier that is based on such topological measures, we found that protein PageRank index had the highest impact on the classification of viral (non-)targets while proteins' ability to topologically control an interaction network played the least important role.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 18 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 17%
Student > Bachelor 2 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 11%
Other 1 6%
Lecturer 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 8 44%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 11%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 6%
Computer Science 1 6%
Physics and Astronomy 1 6%
Other 2 11%
Unknown 8 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 December 2019.
All research outputs
#28,408,789
of 34,166,863 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#183,124
of 223,972 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#302,566
of 374,200 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#2,859
of 3,494 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,166,863 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 223,972 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.1. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 374,200 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,494 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.