↓ Skip to main content

Multidisciplinary team working in cancer: what is the evidence?

Overview of attention for article published in British Medical Journal, March 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
4 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
guideline
2 clinical guideline sources

Readers on

mendeley
308 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Multidisciplinary team working in cancer: what is the evidence?
Published in
British Medical Journal, March 2010
DOI 10.1136/bmj.c951
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 308 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Nigeria 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Unknown 298 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 40 13%
Student > Bachelor 37 12%
Other 31 10%
Researcher 31 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 9%
Other 54 18%
Unknown 86 28%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 115 37%
Nursing and Health Professions 21 7%
Psychology 12 4%
Social Sciences 9 3%
Computer Science 8 3%
Other 40 13%
Unknown 103 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 May 2023.
All research outputs
#4,120,722
of 34,410,315 outputs
Outputs from British Medical Journal
#26,932
of 75,581 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,790
of 147,170 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Medical Journal
#71
of 236 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,410,315 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 75,581 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 147,170 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 236 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.