Enhanced biological phosphorus removal (EBPR) is an engineered water resource recovery facility (WRRF) process configuration that can produce effluent P < 0.5 mg/L. To consistently achieve low effluent P concentrations, EBPR requires volatile fatty acids (VFAs) to induce requisite biochemical reactions. Moreover, returned activated sludge (RAS) nitrate concentrations must be minimized. Returned activated sludge fermentation can potentially address process needs. However, research detailed herein highlights concerns with RAS fermentation integrated with EBPR. Under 2 and 4 hours of RAS fermentation periods, no consequential VFA production was observed; similar results were observed in batch tests with RAS from a full-scale EBPR WRRF. More critically, EBPR performance was poor, with average effluent concentrations of 1.0 to 2.4 mg/L. Furthermore, the glycogen accumulating organism (GAO) fraction under RAS fermentation was 4.3 to 8.7 times higher than in a conventional EBPR mixed microbial consortium (MMC). Integrated RAS fermentation-EBPR only performed well under "high" RAS nitrate; thus, should RAS fermentation be implemented, careful control to prevent anaerobic conditions in the fermentation zone is required.
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 June 2018.
All research outputs
#31,228,352
of 34,411,289 outputs
Outputs from Water Environment Research (10614303)
#1,601
of 1,939 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#334,885
of 372,966 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Water Environment Research (10614303)
#24
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,411,289 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,939 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 372,966 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
