↓ Skip to main content

Systems Pharmacology: An opinion on how to turn the impossible into grand challenges

Overview of attention for article published in Drug Discovery Today: Technologies, July 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
45 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Systems Pharmacology: An opinion on how to turn the impossible into grand challenges
Published in
Drug Discovery Today: Technologies, July 2015
DOI 10.1016/j.ddtec.2015.06.006
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

A pharmacology that hits single disease-causing molecules with a single drug passively distributing to the target tissue, was almost ready. Such a pharmacology is not (going to be) effective however: a great many diseases are systems biology diseases; complex networks of some hundred thousand types of molecule, determine the functions that constitute human health, through nonlinear interactions. Malfunctions are caused by a variety of molecular failures at the same time; rarely the same variety in different individuals; in complex constellations of OR and AND logics. Few molecules cause disease single-handedly and few drugs will cure the disease all by themselves when dosed for a limited amount of time. We here discuss the implications that this discovery of the network nature of disease should have for pharmacology. We suggest ways in which pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, but also systems biology and genomics may have to change so as better to deal with systems-biology diseases.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Spain 1 2%
Germany 1 2%
Unknown 43 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 27%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 13%
Professor 5 11%
Student > Master 4 9%
Unspecified 2 4%
Other 8 18%
Unknown 8 18%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 24%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 9%
Chemistry 4 9%
Unspecified 2 4%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 9 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 October 2015.
All research outputs
#18,295,998
of 27,369,606 outputs
Outputs from Drug Discovery Today: Technologies
#188
of 254 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#160,719
of 276,897 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Drug Discovery Today: Technologies
#2
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,369,606 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 254 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 276,897 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.