↓ Skip to main content

Variation in National Readmission Patterns After Burn Injury

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of burn care & research, June 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Variation in National Readmission Patterns After Burn Injury
Published in
Journal of burn care & research, June 2018
DOI 10.1093/jbcr/iry034
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

A significant proportion of readmissions occur at a different hospital than the index admission, and are thus missed by current quality metrics. No study has examined all-hospital adult 30-day readmission rates, including to different hospitals, following burn injury across the US. The purpose of this study was to evaluate nationwide readmission rates, potential risk factors and ultimately the burden of burn injury readmission, including readmission to a different hospital. The 2010-2014 Nationwide Readmissions Database was queried for patients admitted for burn. Multivariate logistic regression identified risk factors and associated cost for 30-day readmission at index and different hospitals. Previously unreported, 1 in 3 burn readmissions nationally occur at a different hospital, have unique risk factors, and are costlier. Current hospital benchmarking underestimates readmission by failing to capture this unique subpopulation.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 26 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 5 19%
Researcher 3 12%
Other 2 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 8%
Student > Master 2 8%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 10 38%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 31%
Psychology 2 8%
Arts and Humanities 1 4%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 4%
Decision Sciences 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 12 46%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 June 2018.
All research outputs
#31,228,352
of 34,411,289 outputs
Outputs from Journal of burn care & research
#1,891
of 2,093 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#334,255
of 372,630 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of burn care & research
#12
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,411,289 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,093 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 372,630 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.