↓ Skip to main content

Accuracy and Usability of a Self-Administered 6-Minute Walk Test Smartphone Application

Overview of attention for article published in Circulation: Heart Failure, August 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
twitter
28 X users
guideline
1 clinical guideline source

Readers on

mendeley
239 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Accuracy and Usability of a Self-Administered 6-Minute Walk Test Smartphone Application
Published in
Circulation: Heart Failure, August 2015
DOI 10.1161/circheartfailure.115.002062
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

-The 6-minute walk test (6MWT) independently predicts congestive heart failure (CHF) severity, death and heart failure hospitalizations, but must be administered in clinic by qualified staff on a pre-measured course. As part of the Health eHeart Study we sought to develop and validate a self-administered 6MWT mobile application (SA-6MWTapp) for independent use at home by patients. -We performed a validation study of a SA-6MWTapp in 103-participants. In phase one (n=52), we developed a distance estimation algorithm for the SA-6MWTapp by comparing step counts from an Actigraph and measured distance on a pre-measured 6MWT course to step counts and estimated distance obtained simultaneously from our SA-6MWTapp (best estimation algorithm, r = 0.89 [95% CI 0.78 - 0.99]). In phase two, 32 participants (including those with CHF and pHTN) used the SA-6MWTapp independently in clinic and the distance estimated by the SA-6MWTapp was compared to the measured distance (r = 0.83 [95% CI 0.79-0.92]). In phase three, 19 patients with CHF and pHTN consecutively enrolled from clinic, performed 3.2 ±1 SA-6MWTapp tests per week at home over 2 weeks. Distances estimated from the SA-6MWTapp during home 6MWTs were highly repeatable (coefficient of variation = 4.6%) and correlated with in-clinic measured distance (r = 0.88 [95% CI 0.87-0.89]). Usability surveys performed during the second (in-clinic) and third (at-home) phases demonstrated that the SA-6MWTapp was simple and easy to use independently. -A self-administered 6MWTapp is easy to use and yields accurate repeatable measurements in the clinic and at home.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 28 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 239 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Netherlands 2 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Unknown 234 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 34 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 11%
Student > Master 25 10%
Other 20 8%
Student > Bachelor 19 8%
Other 47 20%
Unknown 68 28%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 66 28%
Nursing and Health Professions 31 13%
Computer Science 11 5%
Sports and Recreations 9 4%
Social Sciences 9 4%
Other 30 13%
Unknown 83 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 52. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 June 2020.
All research outputs
#967,181
of 29,868,835 outputs
Outputs from Circulation: Heart Failure
#118
of 1,848 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,861
of 281,409 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Circulation: Heart Failure
#4
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 29,868,835 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,848 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 281,409 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.