↓ Skip to main content

Parental behaviours, but not parental smoking, influence current smoking and smoking susceptibility among 14 and 15 year‐old children

Overview of attention for article published in Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health, November 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
41 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Parental behaviours, but not parental smoking, influence current smoking and smoking susceptibility among 14 and 15 year‐old children
Published in
Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health, November 2011
DOI 10.1111/j.1753-6405.2011.00772.x
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

To explore whether parental behaviours related to smoking socialisation and parenting are associated with smoking susceptibility and current smoking in 14-15 year old students.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
New Zealand 1 2%
Unknown 40 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 15%
Student > Bachelor 5 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 12%
Student > Master 5 12%
Other 3 7%
Other 6 15%
Unknown 11 27%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 22%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 15%
Social Sciences 6 15%
Psychology 3 7%
Arts and Humanities 1 2%
Other 4 10%
Unknown 12 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 November 2021.
All research outputs
#4,989,762
of 28,731,329 outputs
Outputs from Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health
#732
of 2,063 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,460
of 163,990 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health
#3
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 28,731,329 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,063 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 163,990 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.