↓ Skip to main content

Chronic drug use and cognitive impairments

Overview of attention for article published in Pharmacology, Biochemistry & Behavior, October 2002
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
reddit
1 Redditor

Readers on

mendeley
59 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Chronic drug use and cognitive impairments
Published in
Pharmacology, Biochemistry & Behavior, October 2002
DOI 10.1016/s0091-3057(02)00816-x
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Reports regarding the effects of chronic drug use on human cognition and comparisons of different drug user groups have been inconsistent. Methodological flaws may account for some inconsistencies. To determine the effects of chronic drug use on cognition, drug users (n=192) were tested 17.1+/-0.3 days (mean+/-S.E.) and 99.4+/-1.7 days on average after their last use of drugs before beginning treatment. Drug users were categorized as stimulant, alcohol, or polydrug users. Their performance on tests of academic achievement, verbal memory, and abstraction was compared to performance of community-dwelling controls (n=137). The groups were matched on selected demographic and psychiatric characteristics. Historical records of achievement test scores were used to attempt to control for premorbid intellectual ability. Drug users showed impairments on each of the achievement tests (P<.001), as well as poorer total recall (P<.01) and abstraction ability (P<.05). Stimulant users performed worse on several tests relative to the other drug use groups. Only one of six tests demonstrated improvements following about 3 months of abstinence. Thus, chronic drug use is associated with cognitive impairments that do not improve substantially even after several months of abstinence.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 59 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 27%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 8%
Student > Bachelor 5 8%
Student > Master 4 7%
Researcher 3 5%
Other 10 17%
Unknown 16 27%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 25 42%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Unspecified 1 2%
Other 5 8%
Unknown 20 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 January 2024.
All research outputs
#22,927,869
of 34,329,910 outputs
Outputs from Pharmacology, Biochemistry & Behavior
#3,232
of 4,265 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#66,149
of 71,715 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pharmacology, Biochemistry & Behavior
#27
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,329,910 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,265 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 71,715 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.