↓ Skip to main content

Skewness of steady-state current fluctuations in nonequilibrium systems

Overview of attention for article published in Physical Review E: Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics, April 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
12 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Skewness of steady-state current fluctuations in nonequilibrium systems
Published in
Physical Review E: Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics, April 2016
DOI 10.1103/physreve.93.042125
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

A skewness of the probability for instantaneous current fluctuations, in a nonequilibrium steady state, is observed experimentally in a dusty plasma. This skewness is attributed to the spatial asymmetry, which is imminent to the nonequilibrium systems due to the external hydrodynamic gradient. Using the modern framework of the large deviation theory, we extend the Onsager-Machlup ansatz for equilibrium fluctuations to systems with a preferred spatial direction, and provide a modulated Gaussian probability distribution, which is tested by simulations. This probability distribution is also of potential interest for other statistical disciplines. Connections with the principles of statistical mechanics, due to Boltzmann and Gibbs, are discussed as well.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Vietnam 1 8%
Brazil 1 8%
Unknown 10 83%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 25%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 25%
Other 1 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 8%
Professor 1 8%
Other 1 8%
Unknown 2 17%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 7 58%
Chemistry 1 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 8%
Engineering 1 8%
Unknown 2 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 August 2015.
All research outputs
#31,364,844
of 34,546,575 outputs
Outputs from Physical Review E: Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics
#19,446
of 24,721 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#299,532
of 339,226 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Physical Review E: Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics
#302
of 435 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,546,575 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 24,721 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 339,226 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 435 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.