↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Synthesis and Characterization of 4‐(1,2,4‐Triazole‐5‐yl)furazan Derivatives as High‐Performance Insensitive Energetic Materials
Published in
Chemistry - A European Journal, June 2018
DOI 10.1002/chem.201801597
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

3-Nitro-4-(5-nitro-1,2,4-triazol-3-yl)furazan (2), N,N'-bis(trinitroethyl)-3,5'-diamino-4-(1,2,4-triazol-3-yl)furazan (3), N,N'-bis(trinitroethyl)-3,5'-dinitramino-4-(1,2,4-triazol-3-yl)furazan (4) and eighteen nitrogen-rich salts (5a, 5b,5d⁓5i, 5g-1, 6a⁓6i) were designed and synthesized. These 4-(1,2,4-triazole-5-yl)furazan derivatives were fully characterized by IR and NMR spectra, elemental analysis, and differential scanning calorimetry (DSC). The solid-state structures of 2, 5d, 5e, 5h, 5g-1, 6g, and 6i were confirmed via single crystal X-ray analysis. Detonation performance (detonation velocities and pressures) of these energetic compounds was evaluated and the impact and friction sensitivities were measured using standard BAM technology. Some of the compounds, e.g., 2 (D: 9152 m s-1, P = 37.1 GPa) and 4 (D: 9355 m s-1, P = 40.1 GPa) exhibit excellent detonation performance, which are comparable to the highly explosive benchmarks such as RDX (D: 8795 m s-1, P = 34.9 GPa) and HMX (D: 9144 m s-1, P = 39.2 GPa).

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 26 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 19%
Student > Bachelor 4 15%
Researcher 4 15%
Other 1 4%
Student > Master 1 4%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 9 35%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 10 38%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 12%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 4%
Physics and Astronomy 1 4%
Unknown 11 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 June 2018.
All research outputs
#28,780,377
of 34,560,275 outputs
Outputs from Chemistry - A European Journal
#23,113
of 29,609 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#303,873
of 374,219 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Chemistry - A European Journal
#462
of 690 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,560,275 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 29,609 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 374,219 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 690 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.