↓ Skip to main content

Mitochondrial Dysfunction in Stroke: Implications of Stem Cell Therapy

Overview of attention for article published in Translational Stroke Research, June 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (61st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Readers on

mendeley
70 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Mitochondrial Dysfunction in Stroke: Implications of Stem Cell Therapy
Published in
Translational Stroke Research, June 2018
DOI 10.1007/s12975-018-0642-y
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Stroke is a debilitating condition which is also the second leading cause of death and disability worldwide. Despite the benefits and promises shown by numerous neuroprotective agents in animal stroke models, their clinical translation has not been a complete success. Hence, search for treatment options have directed researchers towards utilising stem cells. Mitochondria has a major involvement in the pathophysiology of stroke and a number of other conditions. Stem cells have shown the ability to transfer mitochondria to the damaged cells and to help revive cell energetics in the recipient cell. The present review discusses how stem cells could be employed to protect neurons and mitochondria in stroke and also the various mechanisms involved in neuroprotection.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 70 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 12 17%
Researcher 7 10%
Student > Master 4 6%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 3 4%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 4%
Other 8 11%
Unknown 33 47%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 17%
Neuroscience 9 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 3%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 34 49%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 August 2018.
All research outputs
#8,880,090
of 27,759,640 outputs
Outputs from Translational Stroke Research
#133
of 535 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#130,401
of 346,093 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Translational Stroke Research
#3
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,759,640 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 535 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 346,093 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.