↓ Skip to main content

The intention of irrigators to adopt water use efficient measures: case studies in the north and south of the Murray–Darling Basin

Overview of attention for article published in Australasian Journal of Water Resources, June 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
25 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
The intention of irrigators to adopt water use efficient measures: case studies in the north and south of the Murray–Darling Basin
Published in
Australasian Journal of Water Resources, June 2018
DOI 10.1080/13241583.2018.1486267
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 25 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 20%
Researcher 4 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 12%
Lecturer 1 4%
Student > Bachelor 1 4%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 9 36%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 3 12%
Social Sciences 3 12%
Engineering 3 12%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 4%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 12 48%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 June 2018.
All research outputs
#13,930,202
of 23,092,602 outputs
Outputs from Australasian Journal of Water Resources
#53
of 82 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#176,494
of 328,981 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Australasian Journal of Water Resources
#3
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,092,602 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 82 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.3. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328,981 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.