↓ Skip to main content

Retinal Anatomy and Electrode Array Position in Retinitis Pigmentosa Patients After Argus II Implantation: An International Study

Overview of attention for article published in American Journal of Ophthalmology, June 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (62nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
bluesky
1 Bluesky user

Readers on

mendeley
41 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Retinal Anatomy and Electrode Array Position in Retinitis Pigmentosa Patients After Argus II Implantation: An International Study
Published in
American Journal of Ophthalmology, June 2018
DOI 10.1016/j.ajo.2018.06.012
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

To assess the retinal anatomy and array position in the Argus II Retinal Prosthesis recipients. Prospective, non-comparative cohort study METHODS: Setting: international multicenter study PATIENTS: Argus II recipients enrolled in the Post-Market Surveillance Studies. Spectral-domain Optical Coherence Tomography images collected for the Surveillance Studies (NCT01860092 and NCT01490827) were reviewed. Baseline and postoperative macular thickness, electrode-retina distance (gap), optic disc-array overlap, and preretinal membrane presence were recorded at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months. Axial retinal thickness and axial gap along the array's long axis (a line between the tack and handle), maximal retinal thickness and maximal gap along a B-scan near the tack, midline, and handle. Thirty-three patients from 16 surgical sites in the United States and Germany were included. Mean axial retinal thickness increased from month 1 through month 12 at each location, but reached statistical significance only at the array midline (p-value=0.007). The rate of maximal thickness increase was highest near the array midline (slope=6.02, p=0.004), compared to the tack (slope=3.60, p<0.001) or the handle (slope=1.93, p=0.368). The mean axial and maximal gaps decreased over the study period, and the mean maximal gap size decrease was significant at midline (p=0.032). Optic disc-array overlap was seen in the minority of patients. Preretinal membranes were common before and after implantation. Progressive macular thickening under the array was common and corresponded to decreased electrode-retina gap over time. By month 12, the array was completely apposed to the macula in approximately half of the eyes.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 41 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 22%
Other 3 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 7%
Researcher 3 7%
Professor 2 5%
Other 5 12%
Unknown 16 39%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 15%
Engineering 6 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 2%
Physics and Astronomy 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 22 54%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 June 2018.
All research outputs
#9,050,354
of 28,504,001 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Ophthalmology
#2,146
of 7,486 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#129,748
of 348,305 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Ophthalmology
#45
of 114 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 28,504,001 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,486 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 348,305 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 114 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.