↓ Skip to main content

Distraction, restrained eating and disinhibition: An experimental study of food intake and the impact of ‘eating on the go’

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Health Psychology, July 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#14 of 2,450)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
41 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
twitter
19 X users
facebook
4 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user
reddit
2 Redditors
podcasts
2 podcasts

Readers on

mendeley
100 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Distraction, restrained eating and disinhibition: An experimental study of food intake and the impact of ‘eating on the go’
Published in
Journal of Health Psychology, July 2016
DOI 10.1177/1359105315595119
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jane Ogden, Eirini Oikonomou, Georgina Alemany

Abstract

To assess the impact of distraction on subsequent eating, 60 females consumed a cereal bar while watching TV, walking or talking, and their subsequent desire to eat and food intake were assessed. No effects were found for desire to eat. But while those higher in restrained eating consumed less overall and fewer calories after watching TV or talking, they consumed more overall and more calories (specifically five times more chocolate) if the cereal bar was eaten while walking. 'Eating on the go' may disinhibit restrained eaters either as a form of distraction or by offering a justification to overeat.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 100 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Unknown 99 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 16 16%
Student > Bachelor 15 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 15%
Researcher 7 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 6%
Other 13 13%
Unknown 28 28%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 26 26%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 7%
Social Sciences 5 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 5%
Other 15 15%
Unknown 33 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 359. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 March 2026.
All research outputs
#112,602
of 34,307,719 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Health Psychology
#14
of 2,450 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,852
of 336,953 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Health Psychology
#2
of 235 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,307,719 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,450 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 336,953 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 235 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.