↓ Skip to main content

Critical Temperature of a Trapped Bose Gas: Comparison of Theory and Experiment

Overview of attention for article published in Physical Review Letters, February 2006
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
39 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Critical Temperature of a Trapped Bose Gas: Comparison of Theory and Experiment
Published in
Physical Review Letters, February 2006
DOI 10.1103/physrevlett.96.060404
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Germany 2 5%
China 2 5%
Australia 2 5%
Denmark 1 3%
Unknown 32 82%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 16 41%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 28%
Professor 3 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 8%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 3%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 2 5%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 35 90%
Computer Science 1 3%
Unknown 3 8%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 August 2015.
All research outputs
#16,385,639
of 24,138,997 outputs
Outputs from Physical Review Letters
#26,575
of 37,218 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#64,128
of 72,097 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Physical Review Letters
#183
of 204 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,138,997 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 37,218 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.1. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 72,097 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 204 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.