↓ Skip to main content

R.I.P. Kutner: Parasocial Grief Following the Death of a Television Character

Overview of attention for article published in OMEGA - Journal of Death and Dying, August 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#25 of 1,018)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
9 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
10 X users
video
1 YouTube creator

Readers on

mendeley
102 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
R.I.P. Kutner: Parasocial Grief Following the Death of a Television Character
Published in
OMEGA - Journal of Death and Dying, August 2015
DOI 10.1177/0030222815600450
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

In 2009, Lawrence Kutner, a character on television's House, M.D., unexpectedly committed suicide. A Facebook memorial group was created shortly thereafter in memory of the fictional character. A thematic analysis of fan postings on Kutner's Facebook memorial page revealed evidence of people experiencing parasocial grief as they displayed emotional expressions of grief, reminisced, and advocated for Kutner. Through thematic analysis, we discovered that elements of parasocial relationships, particularly parasocial breakups, were apparent as the members posted evidence of their grief over the loss of a television character. Moreover, this parasocial grief is likely to be disenfranchised, as the death of a television character is typically not recognized by others as a legitimate loss. This study also highlighted the role of social media as an outlet for grief as well as revealed confusion between fiction and reality resulting from social media.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 102 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 102 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 13%
Student > Bachelor 10 10%
Student > Master 10 10%
Researcher 8 8%
Unspecified 5 5%
Other 15 15%
Unknown 41 40%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 16 16%
Psychology 13 13%
Arts and Humanities 6 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 6%
Unspecified 5 5%
Other 11 11%
Unknown 45 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 85. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 September 2026.
All research outputs
#635,690
of 34,414,017 outputs
Outputs from OMEGA - Journal of Death and Dying
#25
of 1,018 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,221
of 302,549 outputs
Outputs of similar age from OMEGA - Journal of Death and Dying
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,414,017 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,018 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 302,549 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them