↓ Skip to main content

Education for the future

Overview of attention for article published in Science, June 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
3 blogs
twitter
113 X users
facebook
7 Facebook pages
googleplus
2 Google+ users

Readers on

mendeley
72 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Education for the future
Published in
Science, June 2018
DOI 10.1126/science.aau3877
Pubmed ID
Authors

Barbara Pietrzak, Adrian Ward, Man Kit Cheung, Beat A Schwendimann, Gurkan Mollaoglu, Michael Tran Duong, Nils Ulltveit-Moe, Veerasathpurush Allareddy, Ken Dutton-Regester, Jian Zhang, Matthew A Scult, Saima Naz, Poonam C Singh, Hong Young Yan, Kyle Isaacson, Allison F Dennis, Eyad Ibrahim Al-Humaidan, Felicia Rounds Beardsley, Cody Lo, Prashant Sood, Tyler Jones, Rense Nieuwenhuis, Basant A Ali, Kun-Hsing Yu, Patrick Kobina Arthur, Brijesh Kumar, Alexander Chen, Falko Buschke, Lubomír Cingl, Syed Shan-E-Ali Zaidi, Anthony Peter O'Mullane, Vinet Coetzee, Nikos Konstantinides

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 113 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 72 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 72 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 13%
Student > Bachelor 8 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 10%
Other 6 8%
Student > Master 6 8%
Other 11 15%
Unknown 25 35%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 9 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 6%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 3 4%
Other 17 24%
Unknown 29 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 99. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 November 2019.
All research outputs
#535,359
of 34,245,361 outputs
Outputs from Science
#12,233
of 93,875 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,004
of 374,419 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#323
of 1,156 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,245,361 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 93,875 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 65.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 374,419 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,156 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.