INTRODUCTION Various methods of delivering specialist palliative care to rural areas have been discussed in the literature, but published evaluations of these models are sparse. This study surveyed the stakeholders of a rural specialist palliative care service (SPCS) to help identify potential gaps and inform planning regarding the future vision. METHODS A survey was sent to all relevant stakeholders across the West Coast of New Zealand, including staff in primary care, aged residential care and the hospital. It focused on understanding the local model of palliative care, the quality of the current service and perceived gaps. RESULTS Thirty-three per cent of the surveys were returned, from a cross-section of health-care providers. The medical respondents rated the quality of the service higher than nursing and allied health participants. All of the groups reported feeling the specialist palliative care team (SPCT) was under-resourced. Additional educational opportunities were considered essential. DISCUSSION Stakeholders found the service easy to access, but improvements in communication, educational opportunities and forward planning were identified as being needed. This information helps the West Coast SPCT plan its future direction and develop a higher-quality service that meets the needs of all stakeholders.
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 September 2018.
All research outputs
#8,884,576
of 27,788,803 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Primary Health Care
#86
of 333 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#130,334
of 347,420 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Primary Health Care
#3
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,788,803 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 333 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 347,420 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.
