↓ Skip to main content

Marijuana Use in Epilepsy: The Myth and the Reality

Overview of attention for article published in Current Neurology and Neuroscience Reports, August 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
googleplus
2 Google+ users
reddit
3 Redditors

Readers on

mendeley
167 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Marijuana Use in Epilepsy: The Myth and the Reality
Published in
Current Neurology and Neuroscience Reports, August 2015
DOI 10.1007/s11910-015-0586-5
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Marijuana has been utilized as a medicinal plant to treat a variety of conditions for nearly five millennia. Over the past few years, there has been an unprecedented interest in using cannabis extracts to treat epilepsy, spurred on by a few refractory pediatric cases featured in the media that had an almost miraculous response to cannabidiol-enriched marijuana extracts. This review attempts to answer the most important questions a clinician may have regarding the use of marijuana in epilepsy. First, we review the preclinical and human evidences for the anticonvulsant properties of the different cannabinoids, mainly tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and cannabidiol (CBD). Then, we explore the safety data from animal and human studies. Lastly, we attempt to reconcile the controversy regarding physicians' and patients' opinions about whether the available evidence is sufficient to recommend the use of marijuana to treat epilepsy.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 167 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 164 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 26 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 11%
Student > Master 19 11%
Researcher 18 11%
Other 15 9%
Other 29 17%
Unknown 41 25%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 30 18%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 18 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 9%
Psychology 12 7%
Neuroscience 9 5%
Other 35 21%
Unknown 48 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 October 2022.
All research outputs
#5,882,242
of 34,350,842 outputs
Outputs from Current Neurology and Neuroscience Reports
#322
of 1,187 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,781
of 305,310 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Neurology and Neuroscience Reports
#6
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,350,842 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,187 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 305,310 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.