A novel bidentate ligand featuring an N-heterocyclic phosphenium cation (NHP(+)) linked to a phosphine side arm is used to explore the coordination chemistry of NHP(+) ligands with nickel. Direct P-Cl bond cleavage from a chlorophosphine precursor [PP]-Cl (1) by Ni(COD)2 affords the asymmetric bimetallic complex [Cl2Ni(μ-PP)2Ni] (2) via a nonoxidative process. Abstraction of the halide with either NaBPh4 or K[B(C6F5)4] prior to metal coordination to form the free phosphenium ligand [PP](+) in situ, followed by coordination to Ni(COD)2, afforded the halide-free Ni(0) complexes [(PP)Ni(COD)] [B(C6F5)4] (4) and [(PP)Ni(COD)][BPh4] (5). Chloride abstraction from 1 is problematic in the presence of a PF6(-) counterion, however, as evident by the formation of [(PP)Ni(PP-F)][PF6] (3). The COD ligand in 5 can be readily displaced with PMe3 or PPh3 to afford [(PP)NiL2][BPh4] (L = PMe3 (6), PPh3 (7)). Complexes 2-7 feature planar geometries about the NHP(+) phosphorus atom and unusually short Ni-P distances, indicative of multiple bonding resulting from both P → Ni σ donation and Ni → P π backbonding. This bonding description is supported by theoretical studies using natural bond orbital analysis.
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 March 2018.
All research outputs
#6,740,548
of 22,824,164 outputs
Outputs from Inorganic Chemistry
#4,036
of 21,669 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#78,936
of 267,013 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Inorganic Chemistry
#26
of 336 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,824,164 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 21,669 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 267,013 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 336 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
