| Title |
Transcriptome profile analysis reflects rat liver and kidney damage following chronic ultra-low dose Roundup exposure
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Environmental Health, August 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12940-015-0056-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Robin Mesnage, Matthew Arno, Manuela Costanzo, Manuela Malatesta, Gilles-Eric Séralini, Michael N. Antoniou |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 259 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 48 | 19% |
| France | 16 | 6% |
| United Kingdom | 12 | 5% |
| Latvia | 11 | 4% |
| Australia | 6 | 2% |
| Canada | 6 | 2% |
| Spain | 3 | 1% |
| Netherlands | 3 | 1% |
| South Africa | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 15 | 6% |
| Unknown | 136 | 53% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 231 | 89% |
| Scientists | 12 | 5% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 9 | 3% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 6 | 2% |
| Unknown | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 238 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Sri Lanka | 1 | <1% |
| Peru | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 234 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 41 | 17% |
| Researcher | 34 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 30 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 23 | 10% |
| Other | 15 | 6% |
| Other | 40 | 17% |
| Unknown | 55 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 58 | 24% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 26 | 11% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 23 | 10% |
| Environmental Science | 13 | 5% |
| Chemistry | 8 | 3% |
| Other | 41 | 17% |
| Unknown | 69 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 636. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 April 2024.
All research outputs
#35,223
of 25,750,437 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Health
#18
of 1,617 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#307
of 280,256 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Health
#1
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,750,437 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,617 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,256 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.