↓ Skip to main content

Sleep in Populations of Drosophila Melanogaster1,2,3

Overview of attention for article published in eNeuro, August 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
116 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Sleep in Populations of Drosophila Melanogaster1,2,3
Published in
eNeuro, August 2015
DOI 10.1523/eneuro.0071-15.2015
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster is a diurnal insect active during the day with consolidated sleep at night. Social interactions between pairs of flies have been shown to affect locomotor activity patterns, but effects on locomotion and sleep patterns have not been assessed for larger populations. Here, we use a commercially available locomotor activity monitor (LAM25H) system to record and analyze sleep behavior. Surprisingly, we find that same-sex populations of flies synchronize their sleep/wake activity, resulting in a population sleep pattern, which is similar but not identical to that of isolated individuals. Like individual flies, groups of flies show circadian and homeostatic regulation of sleep, as well as sexual dimorphism in sleep pattern and sensitivity to starvation and a known sleep-disrupting mutation (amnesiac). Populations of flies, however, exhibit distinct sleep characteristics from individuals. Differences in sleep appear to be due to olfaction-dependent social interactions and change with population size and sex ratio. These data support the idea that it is possible to investigate neural mechanisms underlying the effects of population behaviors on sleep by directly looking at a large number of animals in laboratory conditions.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 116 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 2%
United States 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 110 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 20%
Researcher 18 16%
Student > Master 14 12%
Student > Bachelor 13 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 6%
Other 12 10%
Unknown 29 25%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 31 27%
Neuroscience 26 22%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 21 18%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 <1%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 <1%
Other 4 3%
Unknown 32 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 December 2015.
All research outputs
#23,924,021
of 30,076,286 outputs
Outputs from eNeuro
#2,550
of 3,141 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#197,480
of 279,602 outputs
Outputs of similar age from eNeuro
#16
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 30,076,286 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,141 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.3. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 279,602 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.