↓ Skip to main content

Immunoglobulin light chain allelic inclusion in systemic lupus erythematosus

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Immunology, June 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
40 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Immunoglobulin light chain allelic inclusion in systemic lupus erythematosus
Published in
European Journal of Immunology, June 2015
DOI 10.1002/eji.201545599
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The principles of allelic exclusion state that each B cell expresses a single light and heavy chain pair. Here we show that B cells with both kappa and lambda light chains (Igκ and Igλ) are enriched in some patients with the systemic autoimmune disease systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), but not in the systemic autoimmune disease control granulomatosis with polyangiitis (GPA). Detection of dual Igκ and Igλ expression by flow cytometry could not be abolished by acid washing or by DNAse treatment to remove any bound polyclonal antibody or complexes, and was retained after two days in culture. Both surface and intracytoplasmic dual light chain expression was evident by flow cytometry and confocal microscopy. We observed reduced frequency of rearrangements of the kappa-deleting element (KDE) in SLE and an inverse correlation between the frequency of KDE rearrangement and the frequency of dual light chain expressing B cells. We propose that dual expression of Igκ and Igλ by a single B cell may occur in some patients with SLE when this may be a consequence of reduced activity of the KDE. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 5%
Unknown 38 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 15%
Student > Bachelor 5 13%
Student > Master 5 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 8%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 9 23%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Immunology and Microbiology 13 33%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 20%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 8 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 August 2015.
All research outputs
#22,029,081
of 24,577,646 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Immunology
#6,552
of 6,814 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#228,383
of 268,892 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Immunology
#55
of 65 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,577,646 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,814 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 268,892 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 65 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.