↓ Skip to main content

Autologous cervical fascia duraplasty in 123 children and adults with Chiari malformation type I: surgical technique and complications.

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Neurosurgery: Pediatrics, June 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
21 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Readers on

mendeley
43 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Autologous cervical fascia duraplasty in 123 children and adults with Chiari malformation type I: surgical technique and complications.
Published in
Journal of Neurosurgery: Pediatrics, June 2018
DOI 10.3171/2018.3.peds17550
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

OBJECT Techniques for combined extradural and intradural decompression with expansile duraplasty for Chiari malformation type I (CM-I) have been well described, with various allogenic and autologous materials used for duraplasty. However, the approach and surgical technique used for duraplasty in our treatment of CM-I and developed by the senior author in the 1990s has not been described. METHODS A prospective database was initiated in March 2003 to denote the use of cervical fascia for duraplasty and incorporate an ongoing detailed record of complications during the surgical treatment of children and adults with CM-I with and without syringomyelia. A total of 389 surgeries for CM-I were performed on 379 patients from March 2003 to June 2016. A total of 123 posterior procedures were performed on 123 patients in which both a posterior fossa extradural and intradural decompression with duraplasty (extra-intradural) was performed. In this paper the authors describe the surgical technique for harvesting and using cervical fascia for duraplasty in the surgical treatment of CM-I and analyze and discuss complications from a prospective database spanning 2003-2016. RESULTS The authors found that cervical fascia can be harvested in patients of all ages (2-61 years old) without difficulty, and it provides a good substitute for dura in creating an expansile duraplasty in patients with CM-I. Cervical fascia is an elastic-like material with a consistency that allows for a strong watertight closure. Harvesting the cervical fascia graft does not require any further extension of the incision superiorly or inferiorly to obtain the graft. Complications were uncommon in this study of 123 children and adults. The risk of any type of complication (aseptic meningitis, CSF leak, pseudomeningocele, infection, development of hydrocephalus, and need for ventriculoperitoneal shunt) for the 78 patients in the pediatric age group was 0%. The risk of complication in the adult group was 6.7% (1 patient with aseptic meningitis and 2 patients with CSF leak). CONCLUSIONS Autologous cervical fascia is easy to obtain in patients of all ages and provides an effective material for duraplasty in the treatment of CM-I. Complications from the combination of both an extradural and intradural decompression with autologous cervical fascia duraplasty are uncommon.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 43 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 6 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 9%
Researcher 4 9%
Student > Master 3 7%
Student > Postgraduate 3 7%
Other 6 14%
Unknown 17 40%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 30%
Neuroscience 3 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 5%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 2%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 19 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 August 2018.
All research outputs
#3,696,446
of 34,411,289 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neurosurgery: Pediatrics
#200
of 2,049 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,731
of 373,432 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neurosurgery: Pediatrics
#4
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,411,289 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,049 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 373,432 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.