↓ Skip to main content

Major depression and electrovestibulography

Overview of attention for article published in World Journal of Biological Psychiatry, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (63rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent
facebook
1 Facebook page
reddit
1 Redditor

Readers on

mendeley
40 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Major depression and electrovestibulography
Published in
World Journal of Biological Psychiatry, March 2015
DOI 10.3109/15622975.2015.1014410
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

No electrophysiological neuroimaging or genetic markers have been established that strongly relate to a diagnosis of major depression or its severity. The objective of this paper is to describe the preliminary evaluation of a potential new biomarker for depression utilizing the recording of electrical activity from the outer ear canal referred to as electrovestibulography (EVestG). Sensory oto-acoustic features were extracted from EVestG data to compare 31 healthy age- and gender-matched individuals as controls to 43 major depressive disorder (MDD) subjects (22 symptomatic (MDD-S), 21 reduced symptomatic (MDD-R)). The stimulus was a single supine-vertical translation. The six features examined were based on the measured firing pattern interval histogram and the shape of the average field potential response. An unbiased classification accuracy of 85, 87 and 77% was achieved for separating Control from MDD-S, Control from MDD, and MDD-S from MDD-R groups respectively. Features used showed low but significant correlations (P < 0.05) with MADRS and CORE assessments. The results support the use of separate features for measuring MDD symptomatology versus diagnosing MDD, representing plausible different mechanisms of brain function in MDD-S and MDD-R. The first evidence of the successful application of sensory oto-acoustic features toward diagnosing and measuring the symptomatology of MDD is presented.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Chile 1 3%
Unknown 39 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 20%
Researcher 6 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 8%
Other 2 5%
Other 5 13%
Unknown 12 30%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 8 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 18%
Engineering 5 13%
Neuroscience 4 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 8%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 12 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 November 2018.
All research outputs
#11,542,932
of 34,545,128 outputs
Outputs from World Journal of Biological Psychiatry
#295
of 866 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#107,627
of 306,807 outputs
Outputs of similar age from World Journal of Biological Psychiatry
#10
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,545,128 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 65th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 866 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 306,807 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.