↓ Skip to main content

Architectural and Functional Commonalities between Enhancers and Promoters

Overview of attention for article published in Cell, August 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
46 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
956 Mendeley
citeulike
4 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Architectural and Functional Commonalities between Enhancers and Promoters
Published in
Cell, August 2015
DOI 10.1016/j.cell.2015.08.008
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 46 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 956 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 10 1%
United Kingdom 8 <1%
France 6 <1%
China 3 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
Japan 2 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Hungary 1 <1%
Other 8 <1%
Unknown 913 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 271 28%
Researcher 178 19%
Student > Master 94 10%
Student > Bachelor 87 9%
Professor 48 5%
Other 147 15%
Unknown 131 14%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 358 37%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 331 35%
Medicine and Dentistry 42 4%
Neuroscience 20 2%
Computer Science 18 2%
Other 45 5%
Unknown 142 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 October 2017.
All research outputs
#1,903,865
of 32,476,693 outputs
Outputs from Cell
#5,900
of 19,103 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,613
of 292,638 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cell
#97
of 180 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 32,476,693 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 19,103 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 62.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 292,638 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 180 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.