↓ Skip to main content

An Overview of Dental Adhesive Systems and the Dynamic Tooth–Adhesive Interface

Overview of attention for article published in Dental clinics of North America, October 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
404 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
An Overview of Dental Adhesive Systems and the Dynamic Tooth–Adhesive Interface
Published in
Dental clinics of North America, October 2017
DOI 10.1016/j.cden.2017.06.001
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

From the conception of resin-enamel adhesion to today's contemporary dental adhesive systems, clinicians are no longer afraid of exploring the many advantages brought by adhesive restorative concepts. To maximize the performance of adhesive-based restorative procedures, practitioners must be familiar with the mechanism of adhesion, clinical indications, proper handling, the inherent limitations of the materials and the biological challenges. This review provides an overview of the current status of restorative dental adhesives, their mechanism of adhesion, mechanisms of degradation of dental adhesive interfaces, how to maximize performance, and future trends in adhesive dentistry.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 404 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 404 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 50 12%
Student > Bachelor 39 10%
Student > Postgraduate 32 8%
Researcher 19 5%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 4%
Other 49 12%
Unknown 197 49%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 175 43%
Materials Science 7 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 1%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 <1%
Engineering 3 <1%
Other 6 1%
Unknown 203 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 July 2018.
All research outputs
#24,899,133
of 27,671,578 outputs
Outputs from Dental clinics of North America
#536
of 576 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#297,625
of 336,652 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Dental clinics of North America
#9
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,671,578 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 576 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 336,652 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.