Gastric contractions are coordinated by slow waves, generated by interstitial cells of Cajal (ICC). Gastric surgery affects slow wave conduction, potentially contributing to postoperative gastric dysfunction. However, the impact of gastric cuts on slow waves has not been comprehensively evaluated. This study aimed to define consequences of surgical excisions on gastric slow waves by applying high-resolution (HR) electrical mapping and in silico modeling.
Patients undergoing gastric stimulator implantation (n = 10) underwent full-thickness stapled excisions (25 × 15 mm, distal corpus) for histological evaluation, enabling HR mapping (256 electrodes; 36 cm(2) ) over and adjacent to excisions. A biophysically based in silico model of bidirectionally coupled ICC networks was developed and applied to investigate the underlying conduction mechanisms and importance of excision orientation.
Normal gastric slow waves propagated aborally (3.0 ± 0.2 cpm). Excisions induced complete conduction block and wavelets that rotated around blocks, then propagated rapidly circumferentially distal to the blocks (8.5 ± 1.2 vs normal 3.6 ± 0.4 mm/s; p < 0.01). This 'conduction anisotropy' homeostatically restored antegrade propagating gastric wavefronts distal to excisions. Excisions were associated with complex dysrhythmias in five patients: retrograde propagation (3/10), ectopics (3/10), functional blocks (2/10), and collisions (1/10). Simulations demonstrated conduction anisotropy emerged from bidirectional coupling within ICC layers and showed transverse incision length and orientation correlated with the degree of conduction distortion.
Orienting incisions in the longitudinal gastric axis causes least disruption to electrical conduction and motility. However, if transverse incisions are made, a homeostatic mechanism of gastric conduction anisotropy compensates by restoring aborally propagating wavefronts. Complex dysrhythmias accompanying excisions could modify postoperative recovery in susceptible patients.
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 August 2015.
All research outputs
#21,997,751
of 24,542,484 outputs
Outputs from Neurogastroenterology & Motility
#1,862
of 2,024 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#229,256
of 269,048 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neurogastroenterology & Motility
#19
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,542,484 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,024 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 269,048 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
