↓ Skip to main content

How midwives manage rapid pre‐loading of fluid in women prior to low dose epidurals: A retrospective chart review

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Advanced Nursing, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
guideline
1 clinical guideline source

Readers on

mendeley
28 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
How midwives manage rapid pre‐loading of fluid in women prior to low dose epidurals: A retrospective chart review
Published in
Journal of Advanced Nursing, August 2018
DOI 10.1111/jan.13783
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hannah Lindstrom, Lauren Kearney, Debbie Massey, Guy Godsall, Emma Hogan

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 28 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 6 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 14%
Lecturer 2 7%
Student > Master 2 7%
Professor 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 13 46%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 8 29%
Psychology 2 7%
Social Sciences 2 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 4%
Engineering 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 14 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 February 2020.
All research outputs
#8,536,873
of 32,317,188 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Advanced Nursing
#2,527
of 7,176 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#108,380
of 361,551 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Advanced Nursing
#79
of 108 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 32,317,188 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,176 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 361,551 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 108 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.