↓ Skip to main content

Structural Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Eating Disorders: A Systematic Review of Voxel‐Based Morphometry Studies

Overview of attention for article published in European Eating Disorders Review, November 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
184 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Structural Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Eating Disorders: A Systematic Review of Voxel‐Based Morphometry Studies
Published in
European Eating Disorders Review, November 2011
DOI 10.1002/erv.1163
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

This systematic review summarises and critically appraises the literature on structural magnetic resonance imaging in people with a current or past eating disorder. Studies using voxel-based morphometry image analysis were included. Ten studies reported on a total of 236 people with a current or past eating disorder and 257 healthy controls. Sample heterogeneity prohibited a meta-analytic approach. The findings do not unequivocally indicate grey or white matter volume abnormalities in people with an eating disorder. Nevertheless, these preliminary data suggest that, compared with healthy controls, people with anorexia nervosa have decreased grey matter in a range of brain regions and that those with bulimia nervosa have increased grey matter volumes in frontal and ventral striatal areas. Research in the recovery phase and longitudinal studies suggest that potential brain tissue abnormalities may recover with clinical improvement. Overall, as the available data are inconclusive, further efforts in this field are warranted.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 184 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Canada 3 2%
Portugal 2 1%
United Kingdom 2 1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Unknown 174 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 30 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 14%
Student > Bachelor 23 13%
Student > Master 21 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 16 9%
Other 31 17%
Unknown 37 20%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 49 27%
Psychology 46 25%
Neuroscience 19 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 4%
Social Sciences 5 3%
Other 12 7%
Unknown 46 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 November 2011.
All research outputs
#16,900,730
of 24,851,605 outputs
Outputs from European Eating Disorders Review
#676
of 938 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#101,555
of 146,392 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Eating Disorders Review
#4
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,851,605 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 938 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.3. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 146,392 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.